Intel Arc A380 vs AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc A380 and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc A380
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 95% higher boost clock speed: 2050 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 710x more texture fill rate: 131.2 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 84% higher memory clock speed: 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1050 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4284 vs 4242
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 vs 18 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 275 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4284 vs 4242 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X
- 2.8x more pipelines: 2816 vs 1024
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 820 vs 609
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9437 vs 6216
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 820 vs 609 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9437 vs 6216 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc A380
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel Arc A380 | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 609 | 820 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6216 | 9437 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4284 | 4242 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 36881 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.288 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.947 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 683.568 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11675 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11675 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Arc A380 | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | DG2-128 | Grenada |
| Launch date | 14 Jun 2022 | 18 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 255 | 279 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $429 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2050 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.198 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 65.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 131.2 GTexel/s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 275 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 6,200 million |
| Compute units | 44 | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,914 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 222 mm, 8.7 inches | 275 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
| Width | 114 mm, 4.5 inches | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 186.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 96 bit | 512 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1937 MHz, 15.5 Gbps effective | 1050 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Arc A380 with others
IntelArc A380 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 485M
IntelArc A380 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
IntelArc A380 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
IntelArc A380 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500
IntelArc A380 vs
IntelArc Pro A50
IntelArc A380 vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
