Intel Atom x5-Z8500 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Atom x5-Z8500 und Intel Atom x5-Z8350 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Atom x5-Z8500
- Etwa 17% höhere Taktfrequenz: 2.24 GHz vs 1.92 GHz
- 4x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 631 vs 472
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 1236 vs 892
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 207 vs 168
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 675 vs 529
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.985 vs 2.011
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 85.204 vs 55.944
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.507 vs 0.334
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 4.184 vs 3.487
- 5.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 6.893 vs 1.185
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 500 vs 380
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1685 vs 1180
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1374 vs 1160
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 500 vs 380
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1685 vs 1180
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1374 vs 1160
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.24 GHz vs 1.92 GHz |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 631 vs 472 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1236 vs 892 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 207 vs 168 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 675 vs 529 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.985 vs 2.011 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 85.204 vs 55.944 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.507 vs 0.334 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.184 vs 3.487 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.893 vs 1.185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 500 vs 380 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1685 vs 1180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1374 vs 1160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 500 vs 380 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1685 vs 1180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1374 vs 1160 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Atom x5-Z8500
CPU 2: Intel Atom x5-Z8350
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Atom x5-Z8500 | Intel Atom x5-Z8350 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 631 | 472 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1236 | 892 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 207 | 168 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 675 | 529 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.985 | 2.011 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 85.204 | 55.944 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.507 | 0.334 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.184 | 3.487 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.893 | 1.185 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 500 | 380 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1685 | 1180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1374 | 1160 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 500 | 380 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1685 | 1180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1374 | 1160 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Atom x5-Z8500 | Intel Atom x5-Z8350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Cherry Trail | Cherry Trail |
| Startdatum | Q1'15 | Q1'16 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2457 | 2797 |
| Processor Number | x5-Z8500 | x5-Z8350 |
| Serie | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.44 GHz | 1.44 GHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 90°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.24 GHz | 1.92 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 1 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | 12.8 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | LPDDR3 1600 | DDR3L-RS 1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Ausführungseinheiten | 12 | 12 |
| Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 600 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 500 MHz | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 2 |
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 2560x1600 | |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | 17mm x 17mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | 2 W |
| Unterstützte Sockel | UTFCBGA1380 | UTFCBGA592 |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 2 | 1 |
| Anzahl der USB-Ports | 3 | |
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 2x1, 1x2 | 1x1 |
| USB-Überarbeitung | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Atom x5-Z8500 mit anderen
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
IntelCore i7-620UM
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
IntelCore i5-4300Y
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
AMDA4-9120e
IntelAtom x5-Z8500 vs
IntelCeleron 7305
