Intel Pentium G2020 vs Intel Core i3-3240
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Pentium G2020 und Intel Core i3-3240 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Pentium G2020
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Monat(e) später
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 29.24 vs 7.973
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2000 vs 1356
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2000 vs 1356
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | January 2013 vs September 2012 |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.24 vs 7.973 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2000 vs 1356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2000 vs 1356 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i3-3240
- 2 Mehr Kanäle: 4 vs 2
- Etwa 17% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1781 vs 1554
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2342 vs 1690
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 603 vs 533
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1343 vs 968
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.26 vs 0.181
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.088 vs 0.98
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.681 vs 2.123
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1781 vs 1554 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2342 vs 1690 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 603 vs 533 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1343 vs 968 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.26 vs 0.181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.088 vs 0.98 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.681 vs 2.123 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G2020
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-3240
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium G2020 | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1554 | 1781 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1690 | 2342 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 533 | 603 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 968 | 1343 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 29.24 | 7.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.181 | 0.26 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.98 | 1.088 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.123 | 2.681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2000 | 1356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2000 | 1356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.252 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Pentium G2020 | Intel Core i3-3240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
| Startdatum | January 2013 | September 2012 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $60 | $75 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2522 | 2731 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $32.86 | $67.99 |
| Processor Number | G2020 | i3-3240 |
| Serie | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 24.78 | 18.67 |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.90 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Matrizengröße | 94 mm | 94 mm |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 3072 KB (shared) | 3072 KB (shared) |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | 4 |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 65.3°C | |
Speicher |
||
| ECC-Speicherunterstützung | ||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 21 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 1333 | DDR3 1333/1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1.05 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 |
| Device ID | 0x152 | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1155 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 55 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 2011C | 2011C |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® My WiFi Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Pentium G2020 mit anderen
IntelPentium G2020 vs
IntelPentium 4 HT 521
IntelPentium G2020 vs
AMDPhenom X3 8450e
IntelPentium G2020 vs
AMDPhenom II X4 920
IntelPentium G2020 vs
IntelPentium E6600
IntelPentium G2020 vs
AMDPhenom II X6 1035T
IntelPentium G2020 vs
IntelCeleron G1610T
