AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon HD 8250
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon 625 und AMD Radeon HD 8250 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon 625
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- 2.4x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.6x mehr Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1024 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 128
- 5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1085 vs 217
- 3.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 63
- 6.2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 1075
- 5.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 384
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 628
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 1343
- 5.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 384
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 628
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 1343
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 13 May 2019 vs 1 June 2013 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1024 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 128 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1085 vs 217 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 vs 63 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 vs 1075 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 vs 384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 vs 1343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 vs 384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 vs 1343 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 8250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1085 | 217 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 63 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 1075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 1343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 628 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 1343 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 8250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | GCN 3.0 | GCN |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Temash |
| Startdatum | 13 May 2019 | 1 June 2013 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1134 | 1613 |
| Typ | Laptop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1024 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 6 | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 730 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | 128 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texturfüllrate | 24.58 GTexel/s | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
| Breite | IGP | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | |
| Speicherbandbreite | 14.40 GB/s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | |
| Speichertyp | DDR3 | |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche AMD Radeon 625 mit anderen
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Ultra
AMDRadeon 625 vs
ATIRadeon 8500
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 420 Go
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 (Laptop)
