NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp und AMD Radeon R9 290X Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Etwa 67% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1582 MHz vs 947 MHz
- 3x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 vs 114.883
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2621.94 vs 2460.464
- Etwa 91% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 vs 11.12
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 vs 628.757
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10550 vs 8729
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10550 vs 8729
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1582 MHz vs 947 MHz |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 vs 114.883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 vs 2460.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 vs 11.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 vs 628.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 vs 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 vs 8729 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 290X
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.942 vs 34.491
- Etwa 91% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 vs 3698
- Etwa 91% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 vs 3698
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.942 vs 34.491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7055 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7055 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3343 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 | 114.883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 | 2460.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 | 11.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.491 | 120.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 | 628.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8644 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 770 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42419 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3962 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon R9 290X | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 318 | 286 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Architektur | GCN 2.0 | |
Codename | Hawaii | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Startdatum | 24 October 2013 | |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $549 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1582 MHz | 947 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | 3840 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 5,632 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 2816 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texturfüllrate | 176.0 GTexel / s | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6,200 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | DisplayPort, HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Höhe | 4.4 in | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 10.5 in | 275 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 6-pin + 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 547.7 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 512 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1250 MHz | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |