NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro P2200 und NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 3 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 6% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1493 MHz vs 1404 MHz
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9322 vs 9219
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 vs 530
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 10 June 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1493 MHz vs 1404 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9322 vs 9219 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 vs 530 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
- Etwa 14% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1139 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33770 vs 31445
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13448 vs 11437
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1676
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13448 vs 11437
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1676
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1139 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33770 vs 31445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13448 vs 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13448 vs 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1676 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9322 | 9219 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 | 530 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31445 | 33770 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 13448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 13448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Pascal | Pascal |
Codename | GP106 | GP104 |
Startdatum | 10 June 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 304 | 263 |
Typ | Workstation | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1493 MHz | 1404 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | 1139 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1280 | |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 119.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4400 million | 7,200 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Länge | 201 mm (7.9") | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 5 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 200.2 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 160 bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5X | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7012 MHz |