NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA RTX A5000 und NVIDIA RTX A4000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Etwa 59% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1170 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Etwa 9% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1695 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Etwa 45% höhere Texturfüllrate: 433.9 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s
- Etwa 33% höhere Leitungssysteme: 8192 vs 6144
- Um etwa 50% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Etwa 14% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22884 vs 19421
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1040 vs 994
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154660 vs 122453
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 420.465
- Etwa 64% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 vs 4156.52
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 32.297
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 vs 162.131
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 vs 1895.111
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 vs 22050
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 vs 22050
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1170 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1695 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 433.9 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 8192 vs 6144 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 24 GB vs 16 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22884 vs 19421 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1040 vs 994 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154660 vs 122453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 vs 420.465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 vs 4156.52 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 vs 32.297 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 vs 162.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 vs 1895.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 vs 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 vs 22050 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Etwa 64% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 140 Watt vs 230 Watt
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3714 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA RTX A4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22884 | 19421 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1040 | 994 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154660 | 122453 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 420.465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 4156.52 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 32.297 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 162.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 1895.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11181 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA102 | GA104 |
Startdatum | 12 Apr 2021 | 12 Apr 2021 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 65 | 105 |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1695 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1170 MHz | 735 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 8192 | 6144 |
Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | 149.8 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 433.9 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 230 Watt | 140 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | Single-slot |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 241 mm (9.5 inches) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 550 Watt | 300 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 768 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |