AMD A4-3300 vs AMD Sempron 3000+

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-3300 and AMD Sempron 3000+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-3300

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• Around 56% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 90 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 90% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 973 vs 511
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 942 vs 295

Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3000+

• Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 65 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-3300
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3000+

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	973 511
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	942 295

Compare specifications (specs)