AMD Athlon II M340 vs AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II M340 and AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II M340

  • Around 47% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 858 vs 567
  • Around 45% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 807 vs 556
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 2.2 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 65 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 858 vs 567
PassMark - CPU mark 807 vs 556

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

  • Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 18 Watt vs 35 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II M340
CPU 2: AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
858
567
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
807
556
Name AMD Athlon II M340 AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325
PassMark - Single thread mark 858 567
PassMark - CPU mark 807 556

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Athlon II M340 AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

Essentials

Architecture codename Caspian Congo
Launch date 10 September 2009 10 September 2009
Place in performance rating 2480 2877
Series AMD Athlon II 2x AMD Athlon Neo
Vertical segment Laptop Laptop

Performance

64 bit support
Front-side bus (FSB) 3200 MHz 1600 MHz
L1 cache 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 65 nm
Maximum frequency 2.2 GHz 1.5 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Number of threads 2 2
Maximum core temperature 95 °C

Compatibility

Sockets supported Socket S1 (S1g3) ASB1
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

Advanced Technologies

PowerNow
VirusProtect