AMD EPYC 7301 vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 7301 and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 7301

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 16 vs 8
• 16 more threads: 32 vs 16
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 34148 vs 14600

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

• Around 37% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 2.7 GHz
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 155/170 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2021 vs 1654
• Around 39% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 3895 vs 2802
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 19348 vs 15384

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD EPYC 7301
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1654 2021
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	34148 14600
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	2802 3895
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	15384 19348

Compare specifications (specs)