AMD EPYC 7401P vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 7401P and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 7401P

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 18 more cores, run more applications at once: 24 vs 6
• 36 more threads: 48 vs 12
• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 28293 vs 11240

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

• Around 20% higher clock speed: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 155/170 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1884 vs 1724
• 5.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 3665 vs 699
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 16580 vs 7285

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD EPYC 7401P
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1724 1884
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	28293 11240
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	699 3665
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	7285 16580

Compare specifications (specs)