AMD PRO A12-9800 vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Comparative analysis of AMD PRO A12-9800 and AMD Ryzen 3 2200G processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD PRO A12-9800
- Around 14% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
| Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 90°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm FinFET vs 28 nm
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2052 vs 1686
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6767 vs 3705
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.581 vs 26.268
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 356.091 vs 279.396
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.276 vs 1.975
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.679 vs 34.196
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 136.274 vs 131.8
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2802 vs 1176
- 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3768 vs 477
- 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10990 vs 1715
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2802 vs 1176
- 7.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3768 vs 477
- 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10990 vs 1715
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 February 2018 vs 3 October 2016 |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 90°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm FinFET vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2052 vs 1686 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6767 vs 3705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.581 vs 26.268 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 356.091 vs 279.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.276 vs 1.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.679 vs 34.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 136.274 vs 131.8 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2802 vs 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3768 vs 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10990 vs 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2802 vs 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3768 vs 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10990 vs 1715 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD PRO A12-9800
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD PRO A12-9800 | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1686 | 2052 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3705 | 6767 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.268 | 28.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.396 | 356.091 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.975 | 2.276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.196 | 38.679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 131.8 | 136.274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1176 | 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 477 | 3768 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1715 | 10990 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1176 | 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 477 | 3768 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1715 | 10990 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 852 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2736 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1678 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD PRO A12-9800 | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
| Launch date | 3 October 2016 | 12 February 2018 |
| OPN Tray | AD980BAUM44AB | YD2200C5M4MFB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Place in performance rating | 991 | 316 |
| Series | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops | AMD Ryzen 3 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architecture codename | Zen | |
| OPN PIB | YD2200C5FBBOX | |
| Price now | $97.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.31 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm FinFET |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 95°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 246 mm | |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Transistor count | 4500 Million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2993 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 1108 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Processor graphics | R7 | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| iGPU core count | 8 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | AM4 | AM4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 46-65 Watt | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 x8 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| AMD VR Ready Processors | ||
| Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD PRO A12-9800 with others
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCore i5-2500T
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCore i3-9300T
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3400GE
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDAthlon Gold PRO 3150G
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCore i3-10100T
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDRyzen 5 4500
