AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE and AMD Ryzen 5 2400G processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 387.896 vs 375.23
- 21.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 134.646 vs 6.358
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 May 2018 vs 12 February 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.896 vs 375.23 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 134.646 vs 6.358 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2150 vs 2054
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 8731 vs 6394
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.311 vs 28.715
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.018 vs 2.419
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.366 vs 40.816
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2150 vs 2054 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 8731 vs 6394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.311 vs 28.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.018 vs 2.419 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.366 vs 40.816 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2054 | 2150 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6394 | 8731 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.715 | 42.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.896 | 375.23 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.419 | 3.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.816 | 45.366 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 134.646 | 6.358 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 853 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3173 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2013 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3013 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3310 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10372 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3013 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3310 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10372 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
Launch date | 10 May 2018 | 12 February 2018 |
OPN Tray | YD2200C6M4MFB | YD2400C5M4MFB |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Place in performance rating | 217 | 376 |
Series | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Architecture codename | Zen | |
OPN PIB | YD2400C5FBBOX | |
Price now | $158.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.20 | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm FinFET | 14 nm FinFET |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 95°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | 11 |
Number of threads | 4 | 8 |
Unlocked | ||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 246 mm | |
Transistor count | 4500 Million | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | 2933 MHz |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | |
Graphics |
||
Graphics max frequency | 1100 MHz | 1250 MHz |
iGPU core count | 8 | 11 |
Processor graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics |
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility |
||
Configurable TDP | n/a | 46-65 Watt |
Sockets supported | AM4 | AM4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Not included | Wraith Stealth |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 3.0 x8 | 3.0 x8 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD SenseMI | ||
The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
AMD VR Ready Processors | ||
Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
FreeSync | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |