AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 4
- 20 more threads: 24 vs 4
- Around 124224% higher clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 3.7 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 7 nm vs 14 nm FinFET
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 16x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2707 vs 2061
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 32659 vs 6786
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.575 vs 28.611
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 10 May 2018 |
| Number of cores | 12 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 24 vs 4 |
| Maximum frequency | 4600 MHz vs 3.7 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm FinFET |
| L2 cache | 6 MB vs 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB vs 4 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2707 vs 2061 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 32659 vs 6786 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.575 vs 28.611 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
- Around 62% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 398.506 vs 72.097
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.304 vs 1.745
- 7.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.605 vs 5.887
- 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 130.649 vs 22.686
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 398.506 vs 72.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.304 vs 1.745 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.605 vs 5.887 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 130.649 vs 22.686 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2707 | 2061 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 32659 | 6786 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1276 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 12037 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 8594 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.575 | 28.611 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 72.097 | 398.506 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.745 | 2.304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.887 | 41.605 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.686 | 130.649 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 | |
| Family | Ryzen | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors |
| Launch date | 7 July 2019 | 10 May 2018 |
| OPN PIB | 100-100000023BOX | |
| OPN Tray | 100-000000023 | YD220BC5M4MFB |
| Place in performance rating | 1006 | 222 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3800 MHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm FinFET |
| Maximum frequency | 4600 MHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Number of cores | 12 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 24 | 4 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Compute Cores | 12 | |
| L1 cache | 348 KB | |
| Maximum core temperature | 95°C | |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | |
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | AM4 | AM4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 46-65 Watt | |
| Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | x16 | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics max frequency | 1100 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 8 | |
| Processor graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Ryzen 9 3900X with others
AMDRyzen 9 3900X vs
IntelCore i5-2390T
AMDRyzen 9 3900X vs
AMDA8-9600
AMDRyzen 9 3900X vs
AMDA10-7860K
AMDRyzen 9 3900X vs
AMDA10-6800B
AMDRyzen 9 3900X vs
IntelCore i5-10400T
AMDRyzen 9 3900X vs
IntelCeleron G6900T
