AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and AMD Ryzen 5 2400G processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- CPU is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 4
- 16 more threads: 24 vs 8
- Around 10% higher clock speed: 4.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 14 nm FinFET
- 3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2480 vs 2152
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 25300 vs 8734
- 4.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 9262 vs 2013
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1068 vs 853
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 9726 vs 3173
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2018 vs 12 February 2018 |
Number of cores | 12 vs 4 |
Number of threads | 24 vs 8 |
Maximum frequency | 4.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm FinFET |
L1 cache | 1152 KB vs 384 KB |
L2 cache | 6 MB vs 2 MB |
L3 cache | 32 MB vs 4 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2480 vs 2152 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 25300 vs 8734 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 9262 vs 2013 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1068 vs 853 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 9726 vs 3173 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Around 40% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 68°C
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 180 Watt
Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 68°C |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2480 | 2152 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 25300 | 8734 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 9262 | 2013 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1068 | 853 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 9726 | 3173 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 375.23 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.018 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.366 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 6.358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3013 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3310 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10372 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3013 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3310 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10372 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zen | Zen |
Family | AMD Ryzen Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
Launch date | October 2018 | 12 February 2018 |
OPN PIB | YD292XA8AFWOF | YD2400C5FBBOX |
OPN Tray | YD292XA8UC9AF | YD2400C5M4MFB |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Place in performance rating | 898 | 377 |
Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper Processors | AMD Ryzen 5 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $158.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.20 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Die size | 213 mm | 246 mm |
L1 cache | 1152 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 32 MB | 4 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm FinFET |
Maximum core temperature | 68°C | 95°C |
Maximum frequency | 4.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 12 | 4 |
Number of threads | 24 | 8 |
Transistor count | 9600 million | 4500 Million |
Unlocked | ||
Number of GPU cores | 11 | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | 2933 MHz |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | sTR4 | AM4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 65 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Not included | Wraith Stealth |
Configurable TDP | 46-65 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 x8 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD SenseMI | ||
The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
AMD VR Ready Processors | ||
Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
FreeSync | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Graphics |
||
Graphics max frequency | 1250 MHz | |
iGPU core count | 11 | |
Processor graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI |