Intel Celeron 1017U vs AMD E-450
Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron 1017U and AMD E-450 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 1017U
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 18 Watt
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 803 vs 497
- 2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 882 vs 436
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 271 vs 124
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 497 vs 226
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.259 vs 0.512
- 12.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 12.017 vs 0.98
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.1 vs 0.037
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 0.998 vs 0.395
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 July 2013 vs 22 August 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 18 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 803 vs 497 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 882 vs 436 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 271 vs 124 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 497 vs 226 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.259 vs 0.512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 12.017 vs 0.98 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.1 vs 0.037 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.998 vs 0.395 |
Reasons to consider the AMD E-450
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 1.65 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 2.716 vs 0.538
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2135 vs 1520
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2135 vs 1520
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 1.65 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 2.716 vs 0.538 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2135 vs 1520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2135 vs 1520 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Celeron 1017U
CPU 2: AMD E-450
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron 1017U | AMD E-450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 803 | 497 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 882 | 436 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 271 | 124 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 497 | 226 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.259 | 0.512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 12.017 | 0.98 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.1 | 0.037 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.538 | 2.716 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.998 | 0.395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1520 | 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1520 | 2135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 984 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 296 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 984 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Celeron 1017U | AMD E-450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge | Zacate |
| Launch date | 1 July 2013 | 22 August 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 3044 | 2903 |
| Processor Number | 1017U | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 1000 Series | AMD E-Series |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | |
| Die size | 94 mm | 75 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | |
| Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz | 1.65 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.00 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 31mm x 24mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1023 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 18 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Celeron 1017U with others
IntelCeleron 1017U vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T7100
IntelCeleron 1017U vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T5550
IntelCeleron 1017U vs
IntelCore i5-480M
