AMD FirePro D500 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro D500 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro D500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 6.7x more texture fill rate: 69.6 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 38.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 40
- 21.4x better floating-point performance: 2,227 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17637 vs 5081
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6020 vs 2095
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3285
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6020 vs 2095
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 69.6 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,227 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17637 vs 5081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6020 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6020 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- 9.1x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 274 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 274 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro D500
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro D500 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17637 | 5081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.776 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.081 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.568 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.789 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6020 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6020 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1191 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 399 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro D500 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Tahiti | Haswell GT3e |
Launch date | 18 January 2014 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 668 | 644 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,227 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 69.6 GTexel / s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 274 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 392 million |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 243.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |