AMD FirePro M2000 vs ATI Radeon HD 5570

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M2000 and ATI Radeon HD 5570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 480 vs 400
• Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 39 Watt
• 3.2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 207 vs 194

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5570

• Around 30% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 13 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 520.0 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 482 vs 425
• Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1378 vs 1171
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.393 vs 3.284
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.572 vs 195.801
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.454 vs 0.31
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.345 vs 10.402
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.016 vs 44.254
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1160 vs 544
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 vs 1498
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1709
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1160 vs 544
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 vs 1498
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1709

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M2000
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	425 482
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	207 194
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1171 1378
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.284 4.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	195.801 235.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.31 0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.402 11.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	44.254 49.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	544 1160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1498 1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1709 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	544 1160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1498 1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1709 3360

Compare specifications (specs)