AMD FirePro S7100X vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S7100X and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7100X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 92.54 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1,280
- Around 19% better floating-point performance: 2,961 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1283.973 vs 1235.338
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 70.708 vs 68.443
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 315.677 vs 251.464
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 May 2016 vs 18 August 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1,280 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops vs 2,496 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1283.973 vs 1235.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.708 vs 68.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.677 vs 251.464 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 975 MHz vs 723 MHz
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 81.104 vs 64.888
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.157 vs 5.781
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 975 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 81.104 vs 64.888 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.157 vs 5.781 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S7100X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S7100X | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.888 | 81.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1283.973 | 1235.338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.781 | 6.157 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 70.708 | 68.443 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.677 | 251.464 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6190 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 419 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19089 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7602 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3093 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7602 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2749 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3093 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S7100X | NVIDIA Quadro M4000M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Amethyst | GM204 |
Launch date | 25 May 2016 | 18 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 750 | 550 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 975 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1,280 |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | 78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 5,200 million |
Boost clock speed | 1013 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |