AMD FirePro S9050 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro S9050 and NVIDIA Tesla K40c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 745 MHz
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 245 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4901 vs 4495
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 369 vs 325
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 68.324 vs 61.566
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 344.551 vs 308.261
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 vs 8 October 2013 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4901 vs 4495 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 369 vs 325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.324 vs 61.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.491 vs 6.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 344.551 vs 308.261 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40c
- Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
- Around 61% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 1792
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 4,291 gflops vs 3,226 gflops
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5500 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1779.043 vs 1463.376
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 103.169 vs 91.133
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 100.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops vs 3,226 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1779.043 vs 1463.376 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 103.169 vs 91.133 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro S9050
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40c
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro S9050 | NVIDIA Tesla K40c |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4901 | 4495 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 369 | 325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.324 | 61.566 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1463.376 | 1779.043 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.491 | 6.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.133 | 103.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 344.551 | 308.261 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7062 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17468 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro S9050 | NVIDIA Tesla K40c | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | GK110B |
Launch date | 7 August 2014 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 361 | 513 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 4,291 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2880 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel / s | 178.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 245 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 254 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |