AMD FirePro W5130M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5130M and NVIDIA GRID K160Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5130M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 29.6 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1782 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1410 vs 628
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 262
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1879 vs 1237
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2090 vs 1871
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1879 vs 1237
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2090 vs 1871
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 October 2015 vs 28 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s vs 13.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops vs 326.4 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1782 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1410 vs 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 vs 262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1879 vs 1237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2090 vs 1871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1879 vs 1237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2090 vs 1871 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K160Q
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2654 vs 2582
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2654 vs 2582
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2654 vs 2582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2654 vs 2582 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5130M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K160Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W5130M | NVIDIA GRID K160Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1410 | 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | 262 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5224 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.588 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 505.57 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.885 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.114 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.784 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1879 | 1237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2090 | 1871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2582 | 2654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1879 | 1237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2090 | 1871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2582 | 2654 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W5130M | NVIDIA GRID K160Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tropo | GK107 |
Launch date | 2 October 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1116 | 1044 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,270 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 28.51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
Enduro |