AMD FirePro W5130M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W5130M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5130M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 736 MHz
• Around 78% higher pipelines: 512 vs 288
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 847.9 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3828 MHz
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.588 vs 18.456
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.885 vs 1.693
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.114 vs 27.232
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 89.784 vs 50.114

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

• Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 35.33 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1914 vs 1410
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 301
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6235 vs 5224
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 vs 505.57
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2970 vs 1879
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3114 vs 2090
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2582
• Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2970 vs 1879
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3114 vs 2090
• Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2582

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro W5130M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1410 1914
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	301 423
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5224 6235
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.588 18.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	505.57 618.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.885 1.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.114 27.232
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	89.784 50.114
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1879 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2090 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2582 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1879 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2090 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2582 3356

Compare specifications (specs)