AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro W6150M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W6150M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 45.4 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 768 vs 336
- Around 52% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3332
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3332
- 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 43598 vs 9010
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 vs 17 May 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s vs 45.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3332 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 vs 9010 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 vs 2698
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 vs 2698
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 427 vs 286
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 vs 2358
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 vs 2698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 vs 2698 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 vs 286 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2737 vs 2358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro W6150M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro W6150M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2698 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2698 | 3667 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3332 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43598 | 9010 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 286 | 427 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2358 | 2737 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.814 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 623.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.063 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.402 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.233 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3754 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro W6150M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Saturn | GF114 |
Launch date | 12 November 2015 | 17 May 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 658 | 865 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $353.59 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1075 MHz | 810 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 1,088.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 51.6 GTexel / s | 45.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,950 million |
Maximum GPU temperature | 99 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-Way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |