AMD Radeon 540 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 540 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 540
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35524 vs 8750
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2355 vs 1668
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2355 vs 1668
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 vs 8750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2355 vs 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2355 vs 1668 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- 16x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 247
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1978 vs 1362
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2846 vs 1726
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2846 vs 1726
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 247 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1978 vs 1362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 vs 1726 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 vs 1726 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 540
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 540 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 361 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1362 | 1978 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35524 | 8750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2355 | 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2355 | 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1726 | 2846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1726 | 2846 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.11 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 540 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | 4th Gen GCN | Generation 9.0 |
| Code name | Topaz | Skylake GT4e |
| Design | AMD Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 877 | 993 |
| Type | Notebook | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 16 | |
| Stream Processors | 512 | |
| Texture Units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | |
| Pipelines | 72 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 6 Gbps | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 540 with others
AMDRadeon 540 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7200
AMDRadeon 540 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K500M
AMDRadeon 540 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 X2
AMDRadeon 540 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570X
AMDRadeon 540 vs
NVIDIAT400
AMDRadeon 540 vs
AMDROG Ally Extreme
