AMD Radeon 610 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610 Mobile and AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 1320.5x more texture fill rate: 20.60 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1785 vs 1284
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1785 vs 1284
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2859 vs 2264
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2859 vs 2264
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5302 vs 5166
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 May 2019 vs 1 November 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1785 vs 1284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1785 vs 1284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2859 vs 2264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2859 vs 2264 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5302 vs 5166 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1119 vs 1072
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1119 vs 1072
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1119 vs 1072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1119 vs 1072 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 610 Mobile | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1072 | 1119 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1072 | 1119 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1785 | 1284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1785 | 1284 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2859 | 2264 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2859 | 2264 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5302 | 5166 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 538 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 192 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.569 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.009 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.668 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.819 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 610 Mobile | AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Sea Islands | Oland |
| Launch date | 23 May 2019 | 1 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1326 | 1410 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Compute units | 5 | |
| Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 41.20 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 659.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 320 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.240 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 690 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 499.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 36 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 610 Mobile with others
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4870
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4830
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 350M
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8570D
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
IntelHD Graphics 620
AMDRadeon 610 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R8 M435DX
