AMD Radeon 610 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 740 MHz
- 1745.8x more texture fill rate: 20.60 GTexel/s vs 11.8 billion / sec
- 3.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) vs 900 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1072 vs 1056
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1072 vs 1056
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2859 vs 1352
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2859 vs 1352
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5315 vs 2347
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 May 2019 vs 5 January 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 740 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s vs 11.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 320 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1072 vs 1056 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1072 vs 1056 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2859 vs 1352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2859 vs 1352 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 vs 2347 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1790 vs 1785 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1790 vs 1785 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 610 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1072 | 1056 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1072 | 1056 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1785 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1785 | 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2859 | 1352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2859 | 1352 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5315 | 2347 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 579 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.651 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 213.211 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.624 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.521 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.978 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GT 550M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Sea Islands | GF108 |
Launch date | 23 May 2019 | 5 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1324 | 1501 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 5 | |
Core clock speed | 1030 MHz | 740 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 41.20 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 659.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 320 | 96 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.240 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 20.60 GTexel/s | 11.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 690 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 284.16 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 36 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |