AMD Radeon 620 vs AMD Radeon R7 M350
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and AMD Radeon R7 M350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 1009x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 24.36 GTexel / s
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1830
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1830
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 825 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 24.36 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1830 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1830 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M350
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 722 vs 694
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 722 vs 694
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3227 vs 1116
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3227 vs 1116
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 205
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1093 vs 897
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 722 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 722 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3227 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3227 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 216 vs 205 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1093 vs 897 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M350
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon R7 M350 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1830 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1830 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3227 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 216 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 1093 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5897 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon R7 M350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Meso |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1190 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | 6 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 24.36 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 3,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 16 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 620 with others
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GTX
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon X1600
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
