AMD Radeon 620 vs AMD Radeon R7 M445
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and AMD Radeon R7 M445 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 920 MHz
- 1335.9x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1913
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1913
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 176
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 15 May 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 920 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1913 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 vs 176 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15-25 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2138 vs 694
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2138 vs 694
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1853 vs 1116
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1853 vs 1116
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 943 vs 897
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2138 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2138 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1853 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1853 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 943 vs 897 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M445
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 2138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 2138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 1853 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 176 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 943 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5332 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.765 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 278.624 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.268 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.335 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.067 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon R7 M445 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Meso |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 15 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1303 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 920 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 18.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15-25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 3,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 32 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 620 with others
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GTX
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon X1600
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
