AMD Radeon 620 vs AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1514
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1514
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 13 February 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1514 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2433 vs 694
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2433 vs 694
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6729 vs 1116
- 6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6729 vs 1116
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 414 vs 205
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1584 vs 897
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2433 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2433 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6729 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6729 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 vs 205 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1584 vs 897 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1514 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 2433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 2433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 6729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 6729 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 414 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 1584 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8805 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.891 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 365.4 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.104 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.17 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 132.07 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 705 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Embedded | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Owl |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 13 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 1248 | 949 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 4,940 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 620 with others
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GTX
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon X1600
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
