AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 705M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 705M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 4163.3x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 897 vs 456
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 27 September 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 5.904 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 vs 456 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 705M
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1131 vs 694
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1131 vs 694
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1629 vs 1116
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1629 vs 1116
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 455 vs 205
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 738 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1131 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1131 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1629 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1629 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 455 vs 205 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 705M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 705M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 1131 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 1629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 1629 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 455 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 456 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.569 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 115.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.373 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.904 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 11.055 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 705M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | GF117 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 27 September 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1237 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 738 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 5.904 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 585 million |
| Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 620 with others
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GTX
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon X1600
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
