AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 830M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 830M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 1335.9x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1729
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1729
  • Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 135
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 12 March 2014
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 256
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1991 vs 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1991 vs 1729
PassMark - G2D Mark 205 vs 135

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 830M

  • Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 730 MHz
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1024 MHz
  • Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
  • 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 vs 694
  • 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 vs 694
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1116
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1116
  • Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1005 vs 897
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1082 MHz vs 730 MHz
Boost clock speed 1150 MHz vs 1024 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3589 vs 694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3589 vs 694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 1116
PassMark - G3D Mark 1005 vs 897

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 830M

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1991
1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1991
1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
694
3589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
694
3589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3352
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
205
135
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
897
1005
Name AMD Radeon 620 NVIDIA GeForce 830M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1991 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1991 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 694 3589
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 694 3589
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1116 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1116 3352
PassMark - G2D Mark 205 135
PassMark - G3D Mark 897 1005
Geekbench - OpenCL 4163
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 16.955
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 156.544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 17.81
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 67.443

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 620 NVIDIA GeForce 830M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Maxwell
Code name Polaris 24 GM108
Launch date 13 May 2019 12 March 2014
Place in performance rating 1249 1224
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz 1150 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 1082 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 256
Pixel fill rate 8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s 18.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 33 Watt
Transistor count 1550 million
Floating-point performance 588.8 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None
Width IGP
Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.40 GB/s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus