AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 12% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 590.9x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 41.6 GTexel / s
  • 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 135 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 77
  • Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 897 vs 568
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 11 December 2007
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s vs 41.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 128
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 135 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 205 vs 77
PassMark - G3D Mark 897 vs 568

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

  • Around 82% higher memory clock speed: 1640 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 1116
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 1116
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 1640 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3342 vs 1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3342 vs 1116

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3342
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
205
77
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
897
568
Name AMD Radeon 620 NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1116 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1116 3342
PassMark - G2D Mark 205 77
PassMark - G3D Mark 897 568

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 620 NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Tesla
Code name Polaris 24 G92
Launch date 13 May 2019 11 December 2007
Place in performance rating 1249 1322
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $349

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 128
Pixel fill rate 8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s 41.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 135 Watt
Transistor count 1550 million 754 million
Floating-point performance 416.0 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
Width IGP
Length 254 mm

API support

DirectX 12 10.0
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.3
Shader Model 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 14.40 GB/s 52.5 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 1640 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR3