AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 731.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 33.6 billion / sec
- 3.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 112
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 64
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 897 vs 464
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 21 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 33.6 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 vs 112 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 vs 64 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 vs 464 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2845 vs 694
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2845 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3304 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3304 vs 1116
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2845 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2845 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3304 vs 1116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3304 vs 1116 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 2845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3304 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 64 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 464 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Polaris 24 | G92 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 21 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1069 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Price now | $103.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.86 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 112 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 33.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 105 Watt |
Transistor count | 1550 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 112 | |
Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 900 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |