AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 917.8x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 26.78 GTexel / s
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 176
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 1 April 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 26.78 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 vs 176 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2255 vs 1991
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2255 vs 1991
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3133 vs 694
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3133 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1116
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1093 vs 897
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2255 vs 1991 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2255 vs 1991 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3133 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3133 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 1116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 1116 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1093 vs 897 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 2255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 2255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 3133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 3133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3352 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 176 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 1093 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3333 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.489 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.905 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.66 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.323 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 24 | GK107 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1279 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 837 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 26.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 1550 million | 1,270 million |
Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |