AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 917.8x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 26.78 GTexel / s
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 176
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 1 April 2013
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s vs 26.78 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 205 vs 176

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M

  • Around 15% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 730 MHz
  • Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2255 vs 1991
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2255 vs 1991
  • 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3133 vs 694
  • 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3133 vs 694
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1116
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1116
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1093 vs 897
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 837 MHz vs 730 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2255 vs 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2255 vs 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3133 vs 694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3133 vs 694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 1116
PassMark - G3D Mark 1093 vs 897

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1991
2255
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1991
2255
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
694
3133
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
694
3133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3352
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
205
176
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
897
1093
Name AMD Radeon 620 NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1991 2255
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1991 2255
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 694 3133
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 694 3133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1116 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1116 3352
PassMark - G2D Mark 205 176
PassMark - G3D Mark 897 1093
Geekbench - OpenCL 3333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.489
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 202.905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.66
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 8.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.323
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 620 NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Kepler
Code name Polaris 24 GK107
Launch date 13 May 2019 1 April 2013
Place in performance rating 1248 1279
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 837 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 384
Pixel fill rate 8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s 26.78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 1550 million 1,270 million
Floating-point performance 642.8 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Width IGP
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 12 API
OpenCL 2.0 1.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.40 GB/s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3 / GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus