AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 512.1x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 48.0 billion / sec
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 1 October 2012 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 48.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
- 2.5x more pipelines: 960 vs 384
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3396 vs 1991
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3396 vs 1991
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 694
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 694
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1116
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1116
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 326 vs 205
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1947 vs 897
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 960 vs 384 |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3396 vs 1991 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3396 vs 1991 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 694 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 1116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 1116 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 vs 205 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1947 vs 897 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 3396 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3350 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 326 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 1947 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5980 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.831 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 24 | GK104 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 1 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1248 | 818 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 960 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 48.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 1550 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 67.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |