AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 22% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 512.1x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 48.0 billion / sec
  • Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 1 October 2012
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 600 MHz
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s vs 48.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 75 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

  • 2.5x more pipelines: 960 vs 384
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3396 vs 1991
  • Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3396 vs 1991
  • 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 694
  • 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 694
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 1116
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 1116
  • Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 326 vs 205
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1947 vs 897
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 960 vs 384
Maximum memory size 3 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 1400 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3396 vs 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3396 vs 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 vs 694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 vs 694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 vs 1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 vs 1116
PassMark - G2D Mark 326 vs 205
PassMark - G3D Mark 1947 vs 897

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1991
3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1991
3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
694
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
694
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3350
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
205
326
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
897
1947
Name AMD Radeon 620 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1991 3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1991 3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 694 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 694 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1116 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1116 3350
PassMark - G2D Mark 205 326
PassMark - G3D Mark 897 1947
Geekbench - OpenCL 5980
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 20.831
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 620 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Kepler
Code name Polaris 24 GK104
Launch date 13 May 2019 1 October 2012
Place in performance rating 1248 818
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 960
Pixel fill rate 8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s 48.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 1550 million 3,540 million
CUDA cores 960
Floating-point performance 1,154 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Width IGP
Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size large
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 12 12 API
OpenCL 2.0 1.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.40 GB/s 67.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 1400 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
FXAA
SLI
TXAA