AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

AMD Radeon 620

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 46% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 500 MHz
1536.3x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 16 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 70 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 897 vs 467

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 23 February 2008
Core clock speed	730 MHz vs 500 MHz
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s vs 16 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 96
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 70 Watt
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	897 vs 467

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1820 vs 1116
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1820 vs 1116
Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 365 vs 205

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1820 vs 1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1820 vs 1116
PassMark - G2D Mark	365 vs 205

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1116

1820

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1116

1820

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

205

365

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

897

467

Name	AMD Radeon 620	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1116	1820
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1116	1820
PassMark - G2D Mark	205	365
PassMark - G3D Mark	897	467

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 620	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Tesla
Code name	Polaris 24	G92
Launch date	13 May 2019	23 February 2008
Place in performance rating	1248	782
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz
Compute units	6
Core clock speed	730 MHz	500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	96
Pixel fill rate	8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s	16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	70 Watt
Transistor count	1550 million	754 million
Floating-point performance		160 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-HE
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	IGP
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12	10.0
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Shader Model	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	14.40 GB/s	51.1 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)	1600 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Gigathread technology
HDCP-capable
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting)
PCI-E 16x
PowerMizer 7.0