AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 21% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 602 MHz
  • 638.4x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 38.5 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
  • 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 205 vs 74
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 11 November 2008
Core clock speed 730 MHz vs 602 MHz
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s vs 38.5 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 192
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1536 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 205 vs 74

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

  • Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1116
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1116
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 991 vs 897
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 1116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 1116
PassMark - G3D Mark 991 vs 897

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1116
3358
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
205
74
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
897
991
Name AMD Radeon 620 NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1991
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 694
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 694
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1116 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1116 3358
PassMark - G2D Mark 205 74
PassMark - G3D Mark 897 991
Geekbench - OpenCL 15302

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 620 NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Tesla 2.0
Code name Polaris 24 GT200B
Launch date 13 May 2019 11 November 2008
Place in performance rating 1249 1284
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $1,799
Price now $149.99
Value for money (0-100) 8.67

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 602 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 55 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 192
Pixel fill rate 8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s 38.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 1550 million 1,400 million
Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12 10.0
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.3
Shader Model 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1536 MB
Memory bandwidth 14.40 GB/s 76.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 1600 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR3