AMD Radeon 620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 620 and NVIDIA Quadro K610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 1567.6x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1991 vs 1123
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1991 vs 1123
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 897 vs 727
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 vs 1123 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 vs 727 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K610M
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2253 vs 694
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2253 vs 694
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3195 vs 1116
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3195 vs 1116
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 219 vs 205
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 730 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 vs 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 vs 1116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 vs 1116 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 219 vs 205 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K610M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1991 | 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1991 | 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 694 | 2253 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 694 | 2253 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1116 | 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1116 | 3195 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 205 | 219 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 727 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1956 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.093 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.881 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 620 | NVIDIA Quadro K610M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | GK208 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1248 | 1289 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229.99 | |
| Price now | $75 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1550 million | 1270 Million |
| Floating-point performance | 376.3 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 20.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 2600 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 620 with others
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GTX
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 XT
AMDRadeon 620 vs
ATIRadeon X1600
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID K180Q
AMDRadeon 620 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
