AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon 520

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon 625

AMD Radeon 520

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 20.60 GTexel/s
Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1085 vs 860
Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 206
Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 1182
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 1242
Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 1182
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 1242

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 18 April 2017
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s vs 20.60 GTexel/s
Pipelines	384 vs 320
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1085 vs 860
PassMark - G2D Mark	209 vs 206
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2032 vs 1182
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2920 vs 1242
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2032 vs 1182
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2920 vs 1242

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 520

Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 730 MHz
Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 1024 MHz
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26304 vs 6656
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3215
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3215

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1030 MHz vs 730 MHz
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz vs 1024 MHz
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	26304 vs 6656
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351 vs 3215
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351 vs 3215

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 520

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1085

860

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

209

206

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6656

26304

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2032

1182

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2920

1242

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3215

3351

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2032

1182

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2920

1242

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3215

3351

Name	AMD Radeon 625	AMD Radeon 520
PassMark - G3D Mark	1085	860
PassMark - G2D Mark	209	206
Geekbench - OpenCL	6656	26304
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	322.556
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	32.22
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	70.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2032	1182
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2920	1242
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3215	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2032	1182
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2920	1242
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3215	3351

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 625	AMD Radeon 520
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Polaris 24	Oland
Launch date	13 May 2019	18 April 2017
Place in performance rating	1134	1098
Type	Laptop	Desktop, Laptop
Design		Radeon 500 Series
GCN generation		1st Gen
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	1030 MHz
Compute units	6	5
Core clock speed	730 MHz	1030 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	320
Pixel fill rate	8.192 GPixel/s	4.10 GP/s
Texture fill rate	24.58 GTexel/s	20.60 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	50 Watt
Floating-point performance		660 GFLOPs
Render output units		4
Stream Processors		320
Texture Units		20
Transistor count		1,040 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	IGP
API support
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.40 GB/s	48 GB/s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)	4500 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture
AMD Radeon™ ReLive
AppAcceleration
DualGraphics
Enduro
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
PowerTune
TressFX
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)