AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon 535 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1085 vs 1071
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 193
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 6339
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 2405
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 2405
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1085 vs 1071 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 vs 193 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 vs 6339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 2405 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2343 vs 2032
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3215
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2343 vs 2032
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3215
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.60 GTexel/s vs 24.58 GTexel/s |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2343 vs 2032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2343 vs 2032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3215 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 535 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1085 | 1071 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 193 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 6339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 2343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 2405 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon 535 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Topaz |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 1134 | 991 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | 6 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | 8.20 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 24.60 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 784.1 gflops | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 384 | |
| Texture Units | 24 | |
| Transistor count | 834 M | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 4500 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 625 with others
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Ultra
AMDRadeon 625 vs
ATIRadeon 8500
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 420 Go
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 (Laptop)
