AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon HD 6450

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon HD 6450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 750 MHz
• 4916x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) vs 800 MHz
• 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1084 vs 198
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 119
• 10.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 641
• 10.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.876 vs 1.874
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 322.556 vs 96.774
• 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.478 vs 0.222
• 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 vs 4.98
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.423 vs 19.311
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 497
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 810
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 1627
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 497
• 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 810
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 1627

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450

• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6450

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1084 198
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	211 119
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6656 641
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.876 1.874
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	322.556 96.774
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.478 0.222
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.22 4.98
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	70.423 19.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2032 497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 810
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 1627
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2032 497
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2920 810
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3215 1627

Compare specifications (specs)