AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon HD 6450
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon HD 6450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 4916x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) vs 800 MHz
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1084 vs 198
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 119
- 10.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 641
- 10.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.876 vs 1.874
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 322.556 vs 96.774
- 6.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.478 vs 0.222
- 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 vs 4.98
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.423 vs 19.311
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 497
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 810
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 1627
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 497
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 810
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 1627
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 7 April 2011 |
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 160 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1084 vs 198 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 vs 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 vs 641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 vs 1.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 vs 96.774 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 vs 0.222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 vs 4.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 vs 19.311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 vs 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 vs 1627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 vs 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 vs 1627 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 6450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1084 | 198 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 1.874 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 96.774 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 0.222 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 4.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 19.311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 1627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 497 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 810 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 1627 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 6450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Polaris 24 | Caicos |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 7 April 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1133 | 1626 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 750 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 160 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 30 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 200.0 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 160 | |
Transistor count | 370 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 4 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCIe 2.0 x8 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 8.5-12.8 GB/x (DDR3) or 25.6-28.8 GB/s (GDDR5) |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |