AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon HD 6510
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon HD 6510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 1575.6x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 1970
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 2551
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 1970
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 2551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 14 May 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 1970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 vs 2551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 1970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 vs 2551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6510
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 39 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 48% higher memory clock speed: 1334 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7845 vs 6656
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 39 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1334 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7845 vs 6656 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6510
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 6510 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1085 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 7845 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 1970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 2551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 1970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 2551 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 6510 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Turks |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 14 May 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1134 | 1239 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 39 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 165 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 16 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1334 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 625 with others
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Ultra
AMDRadeon 625 vs
ATIRadeon 8500
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 420 Go
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 (Laptop)
