AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon HD 7290 IGP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon HD 7290 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 400 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 9.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1085 vs 112
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 48
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 1488
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 548
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 1187
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 548
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 1187
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 6 June 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1085 vs 112 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 vs 48 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 vs 1488 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 vs 1187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 vs 1187 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7290 IGP
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7290 IGP
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 7290 IGP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1085 | 112 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 48 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 1488 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 1187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 1187 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon HD 7290 IGP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Polaris 24 | Loveland |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 6 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1134 | 1624 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 18 Watt |
| Transistor count | 450 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 625 with others
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce2 Ultra
AMDRadeon 625 vs
ATIRadeon 8500
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 420 Go
AMDRadeon 625 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
AMDRadeon 625 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560 (Laptop)
