AMD Radeon 625 vs AMD Radeon R7 A360
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and AMD Radeon R7 A360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 910.4x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 27 GTexel / s
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1084 vs 608
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 5809
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 1616
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 1704
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 1616
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 1704
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 27 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1084 vs 608 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 vs 5809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 1616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 vs 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 1616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 vs 1704 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A360
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 223 vs 211
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 vs 211 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 A360
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon R7 A360 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1084 | 608 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | 223 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 5809 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 1616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 1616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 1704 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 625 | AMD Radeon R7 A360 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 24 | Opal |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1133 | 1156 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | 825 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 27 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |