AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce 210 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 5908.7x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
  • 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) vs 500 MHz
  • 9.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1082 vs 110
  • 6.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 32
  • 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 2438
  • 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 497
  • 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 688
  • 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 497
  • 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 688
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 13 May 2019 vs 12 October 2009
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s vs 4.16 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 16
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) vs 500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1082 vs 110
PassMark - G2D Mark 212 vs 32
Geekbench - OpenCL 6656 vs 2438
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2920 vs 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3215 vs 688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2920 vs 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3215 vs 688

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210

  • Around 92% higher core clock speed: 1402 MHz vs 730 MHz
  • Around 61% lower typical power consumption: 30.5 Watt vs 50 Watt
Core clock speed 1402 MHz vs 730 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30.5 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 210

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1082
110
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
212
32
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6656
2438
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2920
497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3215
688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2920
497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3215
688
Name AMD Radeon 625 NVIDIA GeForce 210
PassMark - G3D Mark 1082 110
PassMark - G2D Mark 212 32
Geekbench - OpenCL 6656 2438
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 18.876
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 322.556
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.478
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 32.22
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 70.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2920 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3215 688
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2920 497
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3215 688

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon 625 NVIDIA GeForce 210

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Tesla 2.0
Code name Polaris 24 GT218
Launch date 13 May 2019 12 October 2009
Place in performance rating 1133 1654
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $29.49
Price now $32.99
Value for money (0-100) 6.81

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1024 MHz
Compute units 6
Core clock speed 730 MHz 1402 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 786.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 384 16
Pixel fill rate 8.192 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 24.58 GTexel/s 4.16 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 30.5 Watt
CUDA cores 16
Floating-point performance 39.36 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C
Transistor count 260 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Height 2.731" (6.9 cm)
Length 6.60" (16.8 cm)

API support

DirectX 12 10.1
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.1
Shader Model 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 14.40 GB/s 8.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 500 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR2

Technologies

CUDA