AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce 310M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 4916x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 9.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1082 vs 113
- 9.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 23
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 2949
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 1167
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 1167
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 10 January 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 16 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1082 vs 113 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 23 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 vs 2949 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 vs 1167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 vs 1167 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 310M
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 730 MHz
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 50 Watt
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 310M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce 310M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1082 | 113 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 23 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 2949 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 1167 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 1167 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce 310M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 24 | GT218 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 10 January 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1133 | 1653 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 16 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 14 Watt |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Floating-point performance | 48.96 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 73 | |
Transistor count | 260 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 12.64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
Power management | 8.0 |