AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3781.5x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 6.5 billion / sec
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1024 MB
- 900x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) vs 1.8 GB/s
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1082 vs 307
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 128
- 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6656 vs 1276
- 7.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.876 vs 2.471
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 322.556 vs 77.99
- 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.478 vs 0.233
- 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 vs 6.018
- 17.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.423 vs 4.053
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 555
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 835
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 1155
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 555
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 835
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 1155
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 2 April 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 6.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1024 MB |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1082 vs 307 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 128 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 vs 1276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 vs 2.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 vs 77.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 vs 0.233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 vs 6.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 vs 4.053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 vs 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 vs 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 vs 1155 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 50 Watt
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1082 | 307 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 128 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | 1276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 2.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 77.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 0.233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 6.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 4.053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 835 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 1155 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 24 | GF119 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 2 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1133 | 1625 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $39.99 | |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 810 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 6.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 29 Watt |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 155.5 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 102 °C | |
Transistor count | 292 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1024 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1.8 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
CUDA |