AMD Radeon 625 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 625 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 730 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 1396.6x more texture fill rate: 24.58 GTexel/s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 384 vs 64
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 59 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 768 MB
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1085 vs 404
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 65
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 2917
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 2917
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 vs 30 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 64 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 59 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 768 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1085 vs 404 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 vs 65 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 vs 2917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 vs 2917 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
- Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1085 | 404 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 65 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 2917 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 2917 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 625 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Polaris 24 | G94 |
Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 30 March 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1134 | 1402 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $489 | |
Price now | $186.29 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1024 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 64 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 59 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 176 gflops | |
Transistor count | 505 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 198 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 768 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.40 GB/s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |