AMD Radeon 630 vs AMD Radeon Pro 450

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and AMD Radeon Pro 450 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon 630

AMD Radeon Pro 450

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 800 MHz
1218.1x more texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 32 GTexel / s
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3467 vs 3347
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3467 vs 3347
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 1749
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 1749
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 3344
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 3344
Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9651 vs 8903

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 May 2019 vs 30 October 2016
Core clock speed	1082 MHz vs 800 MHz
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s vs 32 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3467 vs 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3467 vs 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720 vs 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720 vs 1749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3344
Geekbench - OpenCL	9651 vs 8903

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450

Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
2.9x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 221
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2723 vs 1269

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	640 vs 512
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 50 Watt
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz vs 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	619 vs 221
PassMark - G3D Mark	2723 vs 1269

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 450

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3467

3347

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3467

3347

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

1749

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3720

1749

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3344

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3344

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9651

8903

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

221

619

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1269

2723

Name	AMD Radeon 630	AMD Radeon Pro 450
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3467	3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3467	3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3720	1749
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3720	1749
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	3344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	3344
Geekbench - OpenCL	9651	8903
PassMark - G2D Mark	221	619
PassMark - G3D Mark	1269	2723
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		26.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		568.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.409
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		39.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		126.562

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon 630	AMD Radeon Pro 450
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 4.0
Code name	Polaris 23	Baffin
Launch date	13 May 2019	30 October 2016
Place in performance rating	759	788
Type		Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1218 MHz
Compute units	8
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	77.95 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1247 GFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1247 GFLOPS
Pipelines	512	640
Pixel fill rate	19.49 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	38.98 GTexel/s	32 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	2200 million	3,000 million
Floating-point performance		1,024 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	5.7 inches (145 mm)
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	Dual-slot
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	81.28 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective)	5080 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0