AMD Radeon 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 630 and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 38.26 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 2784
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 2784
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 38.26 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3352 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1082 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1594 MHz vs 1218 MHz
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3808 vs 3467
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3808 vs 3467
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10876 vs 9651
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 223
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2454 vs 1272
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 13 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1082 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz vs 1218 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 vs 3467 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 vs 3467 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10876 vs 9651 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 vs 223 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2454 vs 1272 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 | 3808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 | 3808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3352 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9651 | 10876 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 223 | 230 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1272 | 2454 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon 630 | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Polaris 23 | GP108 |
| Launch date | 13 May 2019 | 10 Feb 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 759 | 765 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1218 MHz | 1594 MHz |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1247 GFLOPS | 1,224 GFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 19.49 GPixel/s | 25.50 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s | 38.26 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2200 million | 1800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon 630 with others
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1700
AMDRadeon 630 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5100M
AMDRadeon 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
